Reviewing Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

  1. What is Darwin’s Theory of Evolution? Please explain in terms of Natural Selection. Is Natural Selection purely random chance, or is there design to be understood at various levels? Does this allow for some type of DIALOGUE between religion and science in terms of ultimate truths? What would that be?

The theory of evolution by Charles Darwin in terms of biological evolution put the field of religion at risk. The concept of natural selection explains how these animals and people live according to their ideals. As Charles Darwin claimed, natural selection talked about the distinction between survival and reproduction of individuals because of the disparity of their characteristics. Charles Darwin mentioned that the concept of natural selection served as the key mechanism of evolution. He made use of the idea of genetics to advance his arguments (Moore, 228). He said that people’s natural characteristics and perspectives due to their heritable traits over generations. However, the Bible did not have ideas presented by Charles Darwin. As defined, Darwin pointed out that evolution transpired the concept of descent with modification. He claimed that animals including the lower and upper forms of creatures changed their characteristics over time. It happened during the period of mating and selection. Because of this discovery, Darwin abandoned his religious perspectives and asserted that religion has never been the sole authority (Moore, 228). According to James Moore, the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin advanced the concept of natural selection. This theory contradicted the Book of Genesis, which made him the enemy of the Bible. The Book of Genesis, as Darwin criticized, did not accept and consider Darwin’s principles of natural selection that animals naturally select their mates and pairs and other biological points and instances. According to research, Darwin’s Christian background, as well as his persistent religious principles and his outlooks of God and other supernatural beliefs did not even harmonize well (Moore, 228). In other words, there existed a few things that would support Charles Darwin’s ideas – the field of genetics. Pieces of evidence of evolution showed how Charles Darwin thrived to pin and advance his arguments that the theory of evolution prospered based on evidentiary elements. However, Darwin’s theory is not random at all. There might be a possibility of randomness in the first step; however, the overall process is by chance. In other words, the presentation of the genetic variation would reveal that the process of natural selection would occur at random at a certain step, and yet the overall process of natural selection would never transpire at random order. For example, the survival and reproductive success of individuals would relate to the means and ways that they inherit those genetic functions and traits. The inherited behaviors and characters would function based on the contexts of their environment. As well, based on the field of science, Charles Darwin proved that his scientific discovery and his theoretical works using fossil records as well as the presence of biogeography, comparative anatomy, comparative embryology, and molecular biology helped him advance his model about perspectives of natural selection. However, Darwin’s theory was put under the challenge of religious leaders. he did not even have the chance to justify his point clearly due to pressures. According to research, Darwin did not have the chance to prove it and experiment with his claim; however, his assumptions concerning genetics and other fields brought new light to the study of genetics and other important and relevant sciences (Moore, 228). However, the use of genetics as a field of science to forward his natural selection and evolution would gain positive results. The gene sequences as cited by the series of examinations would confirm Darwin’s theories and hypotheses. This assumption would somehow put the spotlight between religion and science under the covenant and to agree with each of its stances. There might be a dialogue that pushed some agreements between religion and science. However, this dialogue would serve as a justification of idea and a concept of accepting the equality of reasons and truths that both religion and science would be balanced and equal at the same length.

Indeed, Charles Darwin’s claim issued negative remarks against the church. Despite his Christian background, Darwin tried to challenge the belief imposed by religion and claimed that religion and church did not possess the sole authority to claim the truth. His arguments were kept behind his theory; however, supports from scientific fields and pieces of evidence using genetics and other sources could aid and support him. However, Darwin failed to prove his theory since he failed to complete it. perhaps, the Bible seemed angry about was the idea that people came from apes or primates. His theory of evolution would explain how primates and human beings diverged in many instances. It seemed funny to think that people today came from apes or primates but that evidence would show that apes and human beings would have the same or close genetic makeup. Whatever the case might be, science and religion would continue to fight for their positions and stances in society for many years to come.

 

 

Facebook Notice for EU! You need to login to view and post FB Comments!

Are you looking for Jobs? or Job Applicants?
Choose your job activities Below.

POST JOBS SEARCH JOBS